Personality data used within summary synthesis (2019-2025)
Source: https://openpsychometrics.org/
| Big 5 |
2σ- |
1σ- |
μ |
1σ+ |
2σ+ |
| Emotional Stability |
92 |
95 |
97 |
99 |
100 |
| Intellect/Imagination |
95 |
95 |
96 |
96 |
97 |
| Conscientiousness |
51 |
61 |
71 |
81 |
91 |
| Agreeableness |
4 |
19 |
35 |
50 |
66 |
| Extroversion |
6 |
14 |
22 |
30 |
38 |
The Big 5 is the dominant paradigm in personality science due to the model's extensive replicability and predictive validity.
I regularly max the scores for threat-resilience (the inverse of depression, irritability, and moodiness). I regularly max the scores for creativity, curiosity, and willingness to entertain new ideas; high openness isn't strictly a benefit because a strong internal drive towards exploration/novelty exists at the cost of routine. This is buffered by conscientiousness, in that I prefer some form of flexible structure or can be uber-routine/diligence/attention to detail. I am generally not cooperation-at-all-costs; I am able to be socially cohesive or completely dominant. Social interactivity significantly drains me.
Related to threat-resilience: sometime around 2024 a stress test administered by a cardiology specialist placed me within the 'Elite Athlete' category. I've reached the annoying-to-deal-with milestone where the amount of lean muscle mass I have means I can't use weighing scales - a 25 BMI places me in an unhealthily low bodyfat % range.
| Dark Triad |
2σ- |
1σ- |
μ |
1σ+ |
2σ+ |
| Machiavellianism |
2.4 |
3.0 |
3.7 |
4.3 |
4.9 |
| Narcissism |
1.4 |
2.3 |
3.0 |
3.7 |
4.5 |
| Psychopathy |
0.3 |
0.8 |
1.3 |
1.7 |
2.2 |
The Dark Triad is an extensively replicated risk-mitigation assessment for positions of authority.
The average population is 3.00±0.65 for Machiavellianism & Narcissism, 2.00±0.65 for Psychopathy.
In the context of a normal distribution: my scores indicate a 30% higher than normal manipulative cynicism. I have average vanity, self-superiority, entitlement. I have a minimum 90% lower than average callousness, impulsivity, criminality.
Experience in Close Relationships Scale
(>2.5 indicates dysfunctional behavior) |
2σ- |
1σ- |
μ |
1σ+ |
2σ+ |
| Anxiety |
1.8 |
1.9 |
2.1 |
2.2 |
2.2 |
| Avoidance |
1.1 |
1.3 |
1.6 |
1.9 |
2.1 |
The ECR scale is a scientifically sound measure of adult attachment. It can predict dysfunctional/obsessive behavior within organizational heirarchies and professional relationships. None of my behavior is able to be characterized as dysfunctionally attached.
A 2001 study indicates replicability issues with this test, particularly with the "analysis" subscore. Funnily enough, my only subscore that isn't at the highest level is the one in question. I was given this test in both Logic and Chemical Biology courses 15 years after this public criticism, so I don't know if anything has been subsequently modified to be more rigorous. Nevertheless: alternative, more behaviorally-anchored assessment methods provide more defensible measures. Also, obviously these scores are improved with any nootropic supplementation modifying my neurogenetics between 2017-2020, as 2020 is the year my brain reached the commonly considered steady-state maturation ;)
3rd-party (unused in synthesis) proprietary plum.io personality profile independently supports summary
|
